¿Prefieres el boletín en español? No hay problema. Haz clic en este enlace.

Know Your Rights: Discipline, Diagnosis, and the Power of Documentation

This month we are focusing on one core idea: the more you understand, the stronger your advocacy becomes.

We break down how discipline works for students with IEPs and why the 10 day suspension mark is such an important legal turning point. We also talk about something more personal but just as important, helping your child understand their diagnosis in a way that builds confidence and self advocacy.

And finally, we cover access to your child’s educational records. You cannot fully participate in decisions if you do not have the file.

We hope this issue gives you practical tools you can use right away.

Warmly,

Ariel & Chris

In Your Advocacy Backpack

Understanding the Superintendent Hearing and MDR Process

The flowchart above is the roadmap. When a student with an IEP faces suspension, the legal rules shift depending on the length and pattern of removals. The first 5 days are handled at the building level. Days 6 to 10 require a superintendent hearing. Once suspensions exceed 10 total days in a school year, or create a pattern, the district must conduct a Manifestation Determination Review (MDR). At that point, the team must decide whether the behavior was related to the disability or caused by a failure to implement the IEP. That decision controls what happens next.

Why this chart matters:

• Not every suspension triggers an MDR.

• A superintendent hearing is not the same thing as an MDR.

• The 10-day threshold is the legal pivot point.

• Even when discipline continues, special education services must continue.

Parents often hear discipline described as separate from special education. It is not. Once removal days accumulate, federal and state protections activate quickly.

Use this chart as a reference point. When suspension days start adding up, the timeline tightens and the legal stakes increase.

There is a pattern we see often.

A parent sits in an IEP meeting while the district references evaluations, behavior data, service logs, and internal discussions the parent has never reviewed. Decisions are shaped by documents that exist somewhere in a file cabinet or database, but not in the parent’s hands.

That imbalance is not accidental. And it is not acceptable.

Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), parents have the legal right to inspect and review their child’s education records. This is not a courtesy extended by the school. It is a federal entitlement.

Education records include any documents directly related to your child that are maintained by the district. That can include IEPs, evaluations, progress reports, attendance and discipline records, service provider notes, internal data sheets, and emails between staff discussing your child. If the district is using it to make decisions, it is part of the record.

Schools sometimes push back. They may say certain documents are “internal” or “just staff notes.” That exception is narrow. If a document is shared, relied upon, or maintained as part of your child’s file, it is generally accessible. The label does not control. The function does.

FERPA requires schools to provide access within 45 days of a request. In special education matters, especially when meetings or hearings are pending, access must be provided without unnecessary delay. You cannot meaningfully participate in decision-making if you are denied the underlying information.

So how do you make the request properly?

1. Put it in writing. Email is best. Address it to the principal, special education administrator, or records custodian. Date it.

2. Be clear and comprehensive. Do not ask only for “the IEP.” Request the “complete educational record”. Your request can read like this:

   I am requesting access to and copies of my child’s complete educational record pursuant to FERPA and the IDEA. This includes, but is not limited to, all IEPs, evaluations, reevaluations, progress reports, related service session notes, discipline records, attendance records, internal data tracking, staff communications referencing my child, and any documents relied upon in educational decision-making.

3. Keep proof. Save the sent email. If mailed, send it certified. Document the date. The 45-day clock begins when the district receives your request.

4. Follow up if necessary. If you receive partial records, respond in writing and identify what is missing. If timelines are approaching for a meeting or hearing, remind the district that records must be provided in advance to ensure meaningful participation.

Schools may charge reasonable copying fees, but they cannot charge so much that it effectively blocks access and it shouldn’t apply when emailing. And if denying copies would prevent you from exercising your rights, they must provide them.

The file is not just paperwork. It is evidence. It shows what services were delivered, what progress was tracked, how behavior was documented, and whether the district followed through on its obligations.

Parents are equal members of the IEP team. Equality requires information.

If you are advocating for your child, start with the records. The paper trail will tell you far more than any meeting summary ever will.

Education Spotlight

I saw a video recently that has stayed with me. A mother was explaining why she enrolled her son in counseling. He has autism, is getting older, and had started to notice that other kids do not get pulled from class; that loud environments overwhelm him in ways they do not overwhelm others; and that social situations feel harder.

So she made a decision. Not to change him or to “fix” anything, but to help him understand what autism is and that he has it. She wanted him to have language for his own experience.

That moment is bigger than it sounds.

At some point, many children with disabilities realize they are different. They may not have the vocabulary for it yet, but they feel it. If no one explains what is happening, they fill in the blanks themselves. And children are rarely generous in the conclusions they draw.

Instead of “My brain processes things differently,” the thought becomes, “Something is wrong with me.” Instead of “I need support,” it becomes, “I am bad at this.” Silence does not shield them from that. It leaves them alone with it.

What struck me most were the comments under the video. Parent after parent wrote that they had never thought about explicitly explaining autism to their own child. Others admitted they did not know how to begin. Some said they were afraid the label would limit their child or make them feel small.

That fear is understandable. No parent wants to define their child by a diagnosis.

But here is the truth: if a child is old enough to notice they are different, they are old enough to start hearing an honest, developmentally and age-appropriate explanation.

The conversation does not have to be clinical. It does not have to happen all at once. It can evolve over time. It can grow as the child grows.

What matters is that the child understands that while their brain may work differently, those differences come with strengths and challenges. And, most importantly, they are not broken.

When children understand their disability, something powerful happens. They begin to advocate. They ask for breaks. They request clarification. They explain their sensory needs. They stop internalizing every struggle as a personal failure.

Self-advocacy in high school does not appear overnight. The foundation is laid in childhood, in quiet conversations that say, “Here is what is going on, and here is how you can navigate it.”

That mother in the video was not labeling her son. She was empowering him.

And sometimes the most protective thing we can do for our children is tell them the truth about themselves in a way that builds strength instead of shame.

Upcoming Events

📢 Attention special education attorneys, advocates, and allied professionals:

Join me on March 10, 2026, from 5:30pm - 8pm for an essential CLE from the New York County Lawyers Association — Special Education Placements: Law and Practice – Bridging Legal and Educational Perspectives.

This program dives into unilateral private school placements under the IDEA, covering legal standards, educational documentation, effective professional coordination, ethical boundaries, and practical insights for handling placement matters in practice.

Whether you’re seasoned in special education law or looking to strengthen your practice, this session offers critical perspectives on placement issues, due process procedures, IEP documentation, and collaboration with educators and families.
🔗 Register now and level up your expertise!
📍 In-person or webinar options available.

🧩 Tip of the Month ✏️

How to Handle a Cold Call from the School or CSE

When the school or CSE calls unexpectedly about your child, do not feel pressured to make decisions on the spot.

If the conversation involves evaluations, placement changes, discipline, or services, you are allowed to slow it down.

You can say:

“I’d like to review any documents first. Please send the information in writing and we can schedule a meeting.”

Or

“I’m not comfortable making that decision right now. Can we set up a formal meeting to discuss this?”

Why this matters: important educational decisions should not be made in rushed phone calls. You are entitled to notice, documentation, and time to consider your options.

A calm pause is not uncooperative. It is protective.

For more accessibility tips, events and resources, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn!